Saturday, October 1, 2022
HomeBiologyPathogen evolution throughout vaccination campaigns

Pathogen evolution throughout vaccination campaigns



Following the initiation of the unprecedented world vaccination marketing campaign in opposition to Extreme Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), consideration has now turned to the potential impression of this large-scale intervention on the evolution of the virus. On this Essay, we summarize what’s presently identified about pathogen evolution within the context of immune priming (together with vaccination) from analysis on different pathogen species, with an eye fixed in direction of the longer term evolution of SARS-CoV-2.

Adaptation of pathogens can happen when a novel variant is more healthy within the present atmosphere than its predecessors. Host immunity, whether or not generated by vaccination or pure an infection, is one variable that shapes the present atmosphere for pathogens. The dimensions of the present world vaccination marketing campaign in opposition to Extreme Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the pace at which new variants are arising has raised the query of how vaccination efforts may have an effect on viral evolution.

It’s helpful to consider the temporal dynamics of evolutionary change for novel pathogens like SARS-CoV-2 as passing by means of 2 phases. Within the first section, the host inhabitants is immunologically naïve and choice strongly favors adaptation to those ample naïve hosts. Within the second section, a rising proportion of the host inhabitants can have an immunological historical past with the pathogen, both by means of pure an infection or vaccination, and thus choice will shift, more and more favoring adaptation to those immune-primed hosts. On this Essay, we discover how pathogens in novel host species evolve in response to immunologically primed hosts, with a specific concentrate on vaccination.

Conceptualizing pathogen evolution

Pathogen adaptation to naïve and primed hosts depends upon the looks of recent variants in addition to on their health in every host sort. We are able to quantify health by contemplating each absolutely the per capita progress fee of infections brought on by a variant, in addition to this progress fee relative to the expansion fee of the presently dominant sort (typically referred to as the wild sort). Absolutely the progress fee will decide if the variant can unfold in a inhabitants, whereas the relative progress fee will decide if the variant can enhance in frequency and thereby probably displace the presently dominant sort.

For a variant to unfold in a inhabitants, its absolute progress fee have to be optimistic (equivalently, its replica quantity have to be bigger than one). Absolutely the progress fee (ri) of infections brought on by any pathogen variant (i) could be approximated as follows:
the place (p) is the fraction of the inhabitants that has been primed in opposition to the pathogen, and (ri,N) and (ri,P) are the expansion charges of infections by variant i in a completely naïve and totally primed inhabitants, respectively [1,2] (S1 Appendix).

For a variant to extend in relative frequency, and thus probably displace the wild sort, its choice coefficient (s), outlined because the distinction between its progress fee and that of the wild sort, have to be optimistic. For the above mannequin, this choice coefficient is given by
the place (ΔrN) and (ΔrP) are the variations in progress fee between the variant and the wild sort in a completely naïve and totally primed inhabitants, respectively.

With this setup, we can provide a exact definition of a variant being tailored to primed or naïve host populations. If ΔrP>0, then the variant is more healthy (i.e., has the next progress fee) than the wild sort in a inhabitants of primed hosts and so we are saying it’s tailored to primed host populations (equivalently, it’s extra immunity-adapted than the wild sort). Likewise, if ΔrN>0, then the variant is more healthy (i.e., has the next progress fee) than the wild sort in a inhabitants of naïve hosts and so we are saying it’s tailored to naïve host populations. Thus, within the first section of an outbreak, when the fraction of primed hosts p is small, choice strongly favors variants for which ΔrN>0 whereas, within the second section, when p is massive, it strongly favors variants for which ΔrP>0. In what follows, we concentrate on immunity-adapted variants (i.e., these for which ΔrP>0). Word that whereas there are a lot of molecular and mobile mechanisms inside an contaminated host that may make a variant immunity-adapted (Field 1 and Fig 1), it’s the impression of those mechanisms on the expansion fee of the inhabitants of contaminated hosts that determines whether or not a variant spreads.

Field 1. Mechanisms of adaptation.

The power of a variant to unfold between hosts can come up from many various mechanisms working inside an contaminated particular person. The mechanisms listed under are illustrative of the varied vary of doable within-host diversifications.


Fig 1. The destiny of a variant (i) is set by 3 key elements of health, every of which could be affected by a number of within-host mechanisms of adaptation.

All else being equal, variants with elevated infectivity, elevated transmissibility, or an extended and early infectious interval (i.e., lengthy infections and a brief era interval) can have an elevated health (fee of unfold in a inhabitants). As indicated in Eq (1), health depends upon each the diploma of adaptation to naïve and primed hosts. Inside-host processes have an effect on the three elements of health in every of the host sorts. Some within-host mechanisms of adaptation could be measured instantly utilizing in vitro assays. Some elements of pathogen health could be inferred from evolutionary epidemiological research.

Immune evasion (avoiding anti-pathogen responses)

  • Antigenic change
  • Antigenic loss. Inactivation or deletion of molecules focused by host responses. Examples embrace lack of toxins (diphtheria, pertussis)
  • Antigenic repertoires. Modifications in genes controlling the charges at which pathogens generate and expose novel antigens (e.g., trypanosomes, malaria)
  • Elevated cell–cell an infection to evade antiviral humoral immunity that threatens cell-free an infection [3]
  • Altered tissue tropism to immune-privileged websites

Immune suppression (dampening or misdirecting anti-pathogen responses)

  • Up-regulation of enzymes to degrade effector molecules (e.g., ptxP3 in pertussis)
  • Manufacturing of immune-regulatory molecules similar to cytokine mimics (e.g., pox viruses) and immune antagonists (e.g., Orf9b and Orf6 in Alpha variant of SARS-CoV-2, [4])
  • Manufacturing of gear that drive inappropriate responses (e.g., helminths)
  • Manufacturing of “smoke display screen” molecules, which distract immune effector molecules (e.g., malaria, [5])

Immune exploitation (using host responses)

  • Antibody-dependent enhancement (e.g., [6,7])

Direct countermeasures in opposition to immunity, similar to these listed above, usually are not the one doable within-host mechanisms than can contribute to enhanced between host health. A really completely different suite of potential mechanisms has to do with the place, when, and how briskly pathogens replicate.

Different life historical past diversifications

  • Variants that replicate earlier or sooner can overwhelm the immune response, a minimum of initially
  • Variants that replicate extra slowly can probably stay under immune detection for longer (e.g., many persistent viral infections)
  • Variants that may exploit altered host cell invasion pathways can have a bonus when major pathways are blocked by host immunity
  • Variants can purchase traits that improve health impartial of immunity

Traits underpinning these mechanisms can embrace larger binding affinity to host receptors, massive burst sizes (variety of pathogen progeny launched from a bunch cell), altered latency (dormancy in host cell), modifications in tissue tropism, and modifications within the funding of within-host replication relative to transmission stage manufacturing (e.g., malaria). The place transmission is restricted by illness severity (e.g., through host demise or hospitalization), immunity (pure or vaccine induced) can improve pathogen transmission by decreasing illness severity (e.g., Marek’s illness).

The above concepts result in 2 helpful methods of categorizing immunity-adapted variants. First, if an immunity-adapted variant can be tailored to naïve host populations (i.e., ΔrN>0), then we discuss with it as a “generalist” variant since it’s higher at spreading than the wild sort, no matter host sort. Conversely, if an immunity-adapted variant is maladapted to naïve host populations (i.e., ΔrN<0), then we discuss with it as a “specialist” variant since it’s specialised to have larger health than the wild sort in primed host populations solely. This categorization is helpful as a result of, for immunity-adapted variants, generalists will enhance in frequency and exchange the wild sort whatever the fraction of the inhabitants primed, whereas specialists require the fraction primed to be above a vital threshold earlier than they’ll enhance in frequency (Fig 2), similar to after a vaccination marketing campaign.


Fig 2. 4 sorts of immunity-adapted variants.

Strong strains depict the expansion fee of the inhabitants of contaminated people for the wild sort (blue) and for a variant (pink) as a perform of the fraction of the inhabitants that has been primed in opposition to an infection by vaccination, earlier an infection, or each. Priming decreases the expansion fee of the wild sort (rN>rP). Portions ΔrN and ΔrP are the variations in progress fee between the variant and the wild sort in naïve and primed hosts, respectively. Coloured shading signifies which kind prevails evolutionarily: the wild sort (mild blue shading) or the variant (mild pink shading). Panels (a) and (b) present generalists; the variant can be higher tailored to naive hosts (ΔrN>0). Generalist variants will outcompete the wild sort even within the absence of priming. Panels (c) and (d) present specialists; the variant is maladapted to naïve hosts (ΔrN<0). Specialist variants will outcompete the wild sort solely above a vital threshold. Panels (a) and (c) present immunity-inhibited variants; the expansion fee of the variant decreases with rising fractions of primed hosts. Because of this, the expansion fee of infections after adaptation (i.e., after fixation of the fittest sort) in a completely primed inhabitants (black dot) is at all times decrease than that in a completely naïve inhabitants (white dot and dashed line). Panels (b) and (d) are immunity-facilitated variants; the expansion fee of the variant will increase with rising fractions of primed hosts. Because of this, the expansion fee of infections after adaptation in a completely primed inhabitants (black dot) is at all times larger than that in a completely naïve inhabitants (white dot) for generalist variants (panel (c)) however it will possibly go both means for specialists (panel (d); solely the case the place it’s decrease is proven). Panel (e) present a plot of the expansion fee of variants in a completely naïve (ri,N) and a completely primed (ri,P) inhabitants. Blue dot signifies location of the wild sort. Uncolored area corresponds to variants whose progress fee in primed hosts is lower than that of the wild sort and so are immunity-maladapted (and so ignored in our dialogue). Totally different coloured areas correspond to the 4 sorts of variants from panels (a–d). Finer distinctions inside these sorts are introduced in S1 Fig. See S2 Appendix for a dialogue of other methods to visualise variants.

A second helpful approach to categorize a variant is to evaluate whether or not absolutely the progress fee of infections that it causes is inhibited or facilitated by immune priming. Absolutely the progress fee of an immunity-inhibited variant decreases because the fraction of the inhabitants primed will increase, whereas absolutely the progress fee of an immunity-facilitated variant will increase with elevated priming (Fig 2). This categorization is helpful as a result of it speaks as to whether the unfold of an infection will finally be decrease or larger due to priming and subsequent immunity-driven pathogen evolution. If a variant’s progress fee is immunity-inhibited, then rising the fraction of primed hosts will at all times cut back the general unfold of an infection, even when the variant finally replaces the wild sort (Fig 2A and 2C). Nevertheless, if a variant’s progress fee is immunity-facilitated, then if priming drives the variant to interchange the wild sort, it’s doable that the general unfold of an infection goes up (Fig 2B).

The categorization of variants in Fig 2 relies on their per capita progress charges, and such plots are due to this fact particular to immunological context. For instance, the identical variant could be categorized in another way in populations that differ in the kind of vaccination, the recency of vaccination, or the proportion of priming that is because of vaccination versus current an infection. Likewise, such plots are particular to epidemiological context as effectively. For instance, early in an outbreak there’s usually exponential progress within the variety of infections, however as an outbreak progresses and/or non-pharmaceutical interventions are launched, the power of an infection will ultimately decline, decreasing all progress charges (ri,N and ri,P). Ultimately, if the pathogen turns into endemic, the common progress fee throughout all variants will likely be zero. Discover, nevertheless, that the categorization of variants in Fig 2 relies upon solely on the relative progress charges, and so the exact same framework could be utilized to any immunological or epidemiological context (e.g., within the early levels of an outbreak throughout exponential progress or at equilibrium as soon as the pathogen is endemic). Furthermore, if the relative ordering of variants doesn’t change with context, then their classification into 1 of the 4 classes will stay constant regardless of what’s taking place epidemiologically (S1 Appendix).

To conceptualize evolutionary change because the fraction of primed hosts will increase (similar to throughout a vaccination marketing campaign), we will then assemble a plot of absolutely the progress fee of various doable variants in every host sort, finding on the plot every of the 4 sorts of variants from Fig 2 (alternative routes of plotting variants are mentioned in S2 Appendix). We are able to additionally use such a plot for example how the character of choice modifications because the fraction of primed hosts will increase (Fig 3). In Part 1, when most hosts are naïve (i.e., p is small), choice will primarily favor variants with a bigger progress fee in naïve hosts (Fig 3A). As we transfer to Part 2 (Fig 3B), nevertheless, an rising fraction of hosts are primed (i.e., p will increase) and choice shifts to primarily favoring variants with a bigger progress fee in primed hosts (Fig 3C). All through this transition, the variants that seem could be specialists or generalists and both immunity-inhibited or immunity-facilitated.


Fig 3. Choice and genetic variation.

Plots of the expansion fee of all viable variants (i) in a completely naïve and a completely primed inhabitants (black dots). Giant blue dot denotes the present wild sort. Crimson dots are these variants which might be most accessible from the wild sort. Word that the situation of all variants alongside the ri,P axis is restricted to an immune response and could also be completely different for pure immunity and completely different vaccines. All variants within the white area are selectively advantageous however variants within the course of the choice arrow are most strongly favored (dashed strains point out contours of general progress fee). Variants within the grey area are disfavored by choice. The course of choice arrow is upwards in a completely naïve inhabitants (p = 0) (panel (a)) and shifts in direction of the appropriate because the fraction of primed people will increase (panels (b and c)).

With this framework, evolutionary principle then makes some predictions about how we count on adaptation in novel pathogens to unfold as inhabitants priming will increase (similar to throughout a vaccination marketing campaign). As a pathogen adapts, there will likely be occasional selective sweeps through which a brand new variant displaces the wild sort and turns into the brand new wild sort. The sequence of selective sweeps that happens will likely be decided by each the course of choice (the arrow in Fig 3) and the set of variants that occur to look (Field 2). Initially, in a brand new host–pathogen affiliation (similar to people and SARS-CoV-2), there’ll usually be ample scope for adaptation to each naïve and primed hosts, and thus an awesome most of the variants that come up and turn out to be dominant will likely be generalist variants (Fig 4A). Over time, because the pathogen turns into higher tailored to the novel host, and because the fraction of primed hosts will increase, there will likely be fewer new variants that enhance health in each host sorts, leaving primarily specialist variants because the supply of variation for additional adaptation (Fig 4B). Thus, as a pathogen turns into more and more tailored to a novel host, adaptation to primed hosts will are inclined to outcome within the lack of a point of adaptation to naïve hosts.

Field 2. Evolutionary steps resulting in adaptation to host immunity.

Pathogen adaptation requires variation in health amongst variants. New variants come up from mutation throughout replication and from recombination when distinct variants coinfect the identical host. It is very important distinguish between the speed at which new variants come up and the way their health differs from the wildtype.


Fig 4. Pathogen adaptation because the fraction of primed people will increase.

Plots of the expansion fee of all viable variants in a completely naïve and a completely primed inhabitants (dots). Giant blue dot denotes the phenotype of the present wild sort and black arrow signifies course of choice (i.e., the variants which might be most advantageous). Variants within the grey area are disadvantageous. Word that the situation of all variants alongside the ri,P axis is restricted to immune response and could also be completely different for pure immunity and completely different vaccines. Coloured areas point out the 4 completely different sorts of variants. (a) Early in a novel host–pathogen affiliation when a small fraction of hosts are primed. Many potential new variants will likely be higher tailored to each host sorts (i.e., they are going to be generalists). (b) Later within the affiliation, when the pathogen is healthier tailored to its novel host (and a bigger fraction of hosts are primed). The evolutionary trajectory of successive fixation occasions resulting in the brand new wild sort variant is indicated by the succession of blue dots. Word how the change within the location of the blue dot can have an effect on the typology of some variants (i.e., a variant that was recognized as a generalist within the early stage of adaption might later turn out to be a specialist relative to the newer type of the pathogen). As soon as the extent of adaptation is excessive (panel (b)), most advantageous variants that seem will are usually specialists. Despite the fact that generalists are nonetheless extra strongly favored by choice there are fewer of them that may come up.

The speed at which variants come up

Mutations are constantly generated in the course of the replication of the pathogen inside contaminated hosts. The speed at which this happens is proportional to the speed at which genomic modifications happen throughout replication, and the quantity of replication that’s going down. Immunity (pure or vaccine induced) reduces the quantity of replication in 2 methods. First, on the within-host stage, if a primed host is contaminated, the immune response is anticipated to cut back the pathogen load and to clear the an infection sooner. Second, on the between-host stage, a excessive fraction of primed people within the inhabitants is anticipated to cut back the variety of contaminated hosts (each naïve and primed). Nevertheless, these results are tempered for imperfect (or leaky) immunity/vaccines as a result of they’ve a decrease potential to cut back pathogen replication and to forestall an infection.

The health results of variants

The destiny of a brand new variant is set by how the speed of change of variety of infections it causes differs from that of the wild sort in each naïve and primed populations (i.e., the place it falls in Fig 3 relative to the wild sort). To this finish, it’s helpful to tell apart between the set of variants which might be doable (all of the dots in Fig 3) and the set of variants which might be readily accessible genetically from the wild sort (the subset of pink dots in Fig 3). There will likely be organic constraints on the magnitude of progress fee that’s doable within the 2 host sorts and due to this fact all of the dots in Fig 3 will fall inside some particular area of the airplane. Most mutations are anticipated to be deleterious or have little impact, however some could lead to a bigger progress fee than the wild sort [8,9]. Therefore, we count on a excessive density of doable phenotypes (black dots in Fig 3) with low health relative to the density of phenotypes that enhance health in each host sorts. Inside this set of doable variants, some will likely be extra readily accessible from the present wild sort than others for a number of causes. First, some variants could be a number of mutational or recombinational steps away from the wild sort and so will likely be exceedingly unlikely to come up. For instance, the dearth of adaptation of measles virus to vaccines regardless of many years of world vaccination is probably as a result of variants that may escape a polyclonal antibody response require a minimum of 5 new mutations to the H glycoprotein [10]. Second, competitors between the variant and the wild sort inside an an infection can promote (or hamper) the variant’s potential to achieve a density excessive sufficient for onward transmission to happen. For instance, in novel host–pathogen associations, mutations which might be useful for within-host competitors are additionally more likely to be useful in different respects, together with their potential to unfold on the between-host stage just because extra generalist variants are accessible when the wild sort is poorly tailored to its host. Because the affiliation turns into extra established, nevertheless, variants which might be profitable inside hosts will are inclined to have diminished success on the between-host stage. This impact of within-host choice biasing the set of variants which might be accessible to between-host choice is probably going additionally modulated by the energy of immunity (e.g., the leakiness of a vaccine [11]).

Vaccination and the pace of pathogen adaptation

Sooner rollout and more practical vaccines will, all else being equal, restrict the emergence of recent variants. Therefore, using “leaky” vaccines (i.e., vaccines that don’t fully forestall an infection and onward transmission) and the prevalence of persistent infections in immunocompromised hosts might pace up pathogen adaptation each as a result of they enhance the flux of mutation relative to using non-leaky vaccines and since they facilitate the within-host rise of some immunity-adapted variants. As soon as an immunity-adapted variant is circulating within the inhabitants, the affect on evolutionary adaptation of the speed at which it arises by means of mutation is negligible in comparison with the choice performing on the variant (e.g., the dynamics of the Alpha and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2 had been pushed by choice, not by the flux of mutations [12,13]). On this case, the pace of pathogen adaptation is principally pushed by choice and completely different focused vaccination methods could present methods to decelerate this adaptation [14–16].

It’s tougher to make predictions about whether or not variants are more likely to be immunity-inhibited or immunity-facilitated. At first, one may marvel if immunity-facilitated variants are even doable however, as we element within the subsequent part, such variants have been documented in some infectious ailments. Furthermore, it’s not troublesome to think about how such a variant may happen for SARS-CoV-2. For instance, folks with signs usually isolate and socially distance so they don’t infect others. A variant that evades immunity by way of its transmissibility might unfold extra quickly in a completely primed inhabitants than in a completely naïve inhabitants (i.e., it might be immunity-facilitated) if priming reduces illness severity and so reduces the speed of isolation and social distancing. This hypothetical instance helps to emphasise that categorizing a variant as immunity-facilitated is solely a press release about its health (i.e., its potential to unfold) and it carries with it no a priori implication about whether or not the unfold of such a variant would finally result in a better or lesser quantity of illness, both in a person an infection or within the inhabitants general.

The above principle is common and applies to each infection-primed and vaccine-primed hosts. The immunity generated by these 2 strategies might be comparable, however it needn’t be. In the remainder of this Essay, we discover the above principle within the context of vaccine-primed hosts particularly.

Examples of pathogen adaptation to vaccination

Earlier than contemplating examples of adaptation to vaccine-primed hosts, or equivalently “vaccinated hosts,” you will need to stress that many vaccines haven’t been undermined by pathogen adaptation (e.g., smallpox, measles, polio). This lack of adaptation is hypothesized to outcome from 2 options generally related to vaccination [17]. First, as a result of vaccination is a prophylactic intervention, it will possibly preserve pathogen numbers small inside vaccinated hosts, which limits the era and transmission of novel variants. Second, as a result of vaccines usually induce immune responses in opposition to a number of targets on a pathogen, a number of genetic modifications could also be required to bypass vaccine-mediated immunity [10]. Each options are anticipated to restrict the power of the pathogens to adapt to vaccination by hampering the accessibility of variants (fewer pink dots in Fig 3 and Field 2). Nevertheless, for a handful of vaccines that don’t preserve pathogen densities under transmissible ranges within the majority of contaminated hosts, or that don’t induce immunity in opposition to a number of targets, evolutionary adaptation has occurred [17]. Given these caveats, we glance to those earlier examples for steerage on doable outcomes of adaptation to vaccination in SARS-CoV-2.

Essentially the most direct approach to decide how vaccines have an effect on pathogen adaptation is thru experimental evolution, but we all know of just one examine that takes this strategy. It concerned a novel host–pathogen affiliation of malaria parasites with laboratory mice [18]. Parasites had been serially passaged for 20 generations by means of both vaccinated or naïve mice and allowed to evolve in response to those completely different therapies. The parasites turned progressively higher in a position to replicate within the host sort they had been evolving in, however in addition they advanced a greater replication fee within the different host sort as effectively. Furthermore, vaccination inhibited the replication of all of the advanced pathogens, demonstrating that the variants that arose throughout evolution had been immunity-inhibited generalists.

Most different knowledge are observational and concentrate on pathogen species which have a long-term affiliation with their host. As anticipated from the sooner issues, many immunity-adapted variants seem like specialist variants relative to the wild sort. For instance, immunity-adapted variants of hepatitis B virus that come up following vaccination have altered floor antigens, making the vaccine much less efficient [19]. These variants trigger sporadic breakthrough infections however they haven’t elevated in general quantity on the inhabitants stage whilst vaccination charges have elevated [20,21]. This means that, though they’re more healthy than the wild sort inside vaccinated hosts, their unfold from vaccinated hosts is seemingly suppressed, making them immunity-inhibited specialists. For Bordetella pertussis, using acellular vaccines that focus on pertactin have led to the unfold of immunity-adapted variants that now not specific pertactin [22]. These variants seem like more healthy than the wild sort in vaccinated hosts however much less slot in naïve hosts, making them specialist variants [23]. Variants additionally come up that overexpress the immunosuppressive pertussis toxin molecule, and these seem like more healthy than non-overexpressing variants in each naïve and acellular-vaccinated hosts [24]. Notably, health was not assayed in hosts vaccinated with whole-cell vaccines, limiting our potential to definitively classify the variants as specialists or generalists. For each units of B. pertussis variants, nevertheless, the power of the variants to unfold in a vaccinated inhabitants seems to be lower than in naïve populations [23,24], making all of them immunity-inhibited variants.

Comparable patterns usually come up with vaccines utilized in cattle, though the information crucial to tell apart between specialist and generalist variants are sometimes inconclusive. For instance, avian metapneumovirus vaccination suppressed virus shedding in turkeys, however much less so for current isolates of the virus than for historic isolates, and no distinction was detected between the isolates in non-vaccinated turkeys [25]. This distinction has been credited to amino acid coding divergence in 2 genes [25]. Equally, breakthrough in opposition to a vaccine for the fish bacterial pathogen Yersinia ruckeri is related to a lack of the bacterial flagellum [26]. Nevertheless, partial vaccine safety persists in opposition to all examined variants [27], once more suggesting that these variants are immunity-inhibited.

One strikingly completely different instance is the rooster pathogen Marek’s illness virus (MDV). MDV is an oncogenic virus that may trigger paralysis and excessive ranges of mortality [28], and a succession of vaccines have been developed and deployed in response to continuous vaccine-driven evolution [29]. The immunity-adapted variants which have been analyzed seem like disfavored in naïve chickens relative to the ancestral virus [30]. Nonetheless, not like the examples described above, the immunity-adapted variants of MDV transmit higher from vaccinated chickens than from naïve chickens [30]. These variants are due to this fact examples of immunity-facilitated specialist variants. Notably, the general prevalence of illness within the poultry trade was however diminished by vaccination regardless of this evolution [31] (as in Fig 2D).

Different examples of evolution in response to vaccination contain host–pathogen associations through which a number of serotypes coexist and vaccines goal solely a subset of these serotypes. These conditions are extra complicated as a result of the very coexistence of serotypes means that a number of host sorts are current, probably due to distinct immunological histories which have arisen by means of pure an infection by the completely different serotypes. Because of this, the framework in Figs 3 and 4 would should be prolonged with further axes similar to the completely different sorts of hosts, since vaccination and pure an infection seem to prime hosts in numerous methods on this system. Nonetheless, we will draw an analogy to the earlier examples by viewing the set of serotypes focused by the vaccine because the “wild sort” and the non-targeted serotypes because the “variants.” The truth that the wild sort and variant serotypes coexist means that, as anticipated, they’re specialist variants. It’s tougher to categorize them as being immunity-inhibited or immunity-facilitated, however in all examples that we’re conscious of, the entire prevalence of an infection has both gone down or remained unchanged after the deployment of the vaccine. For instance, vaccination in opposition to Streptococcus pneumoniae usually resulted in no change within the whole prevalence of bacterial carriage as a result of non-targeted serotypes fully changed vaccine-targeted serotypes following vaccination (though illness burden has been diminished) [32–34]. Against this, for human papillomavirus, vaccination diminished the entire variety of infections as a result of non-targeted serotypes didn’t change in prevalence whereas vaccine-targeted serotypes turned much less widespread [35]. Different examples involving coexisting serotypes, together with B. pertussis [36], Haemophilus influenzae [37], Neisseria meningitidis [38], and rotavirus [39], seem to fall someplace between these 2 extremes.

One remaining instance is human influenza virus, which regularly evolves in response to host immunity by means of a course of often called antigenic drift, producing many sequential influenza variants over time [40]. To maintain up with antigenic drift, flu vaccines are steadily up to date. Once more, this may be conceptualized within the present framework by introducing a brand new axis in Figs 3 and 4 each time a brand new vaccine is launched and/or a brand new immunological sort of host arises. We had been unable to search out definitive knowledge that addresses whether or not influenza variants are usually generalists or specialists. Both means, current knowledge counsel that the majority novel variants arising by means of antigenic drift are partially inhibited by vaccination, making them immunity-inhibited variants [41].

Thus, within the handful of instances the place vaccine adaptation has been noticed, specialist variants have been concerned. That is per our theoretical expectation that generalist variants will ultimately give approach to specialist variants as novel host–pathogen associations turn out to be extra established (Fig 4). Furthermore, most of these handful of instances contain immunity-inhibited specialists. Because of this, vaccination has usually resulted in a diminished general unfold of an infection, even when vaccination drove the evolutionary benefit of the variants. We’ve recognized examples of immunity-facilitated specialist variants, however it’s noteworthy that even in these instances, it seems that such a vaccine-driven enhance within the general prevalence of illness has by no means been documented [42].

We’re unaware of any examples of immunity-facilitated generalist variants in any infectious illness. Such a variant would unfold no matter vaccine protection, and it might additionally essentially compromise our potential to regulate an infection utilizing that exact vaccine (as in Fig 2C). It’s not clear if the obvious absence of such variants is as a result of only a few variants on this class are doable (Field 2), or whether it is as a result of generalist variants will likely be uncommon, besides when host–pathogen associations are new. As mentioned above, it’s doable to think about such variants, however once more we stress that even when they arose, their unfold needn’t essentially result in a better general quantity of illness in both contaminated people or on the inhabitants stage.


There may be now substantial proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been present process fast adaptive evolution since its first look in people. The primary compelling knowledge concerned the unfold of the Alpha and Delta variants due to their health benefits over the wild sort [12,13,43]. What does our framework inform us concerning the potential for SARS-CoV-2 adaptation to primed hosts? Epidemiological knowledge from a number of international locations counsel that, as anticipated, the principle immunity-adapted variants to look to this point are immunity-inhibited generalists. The Delta variant elevated in frequency in international locations with very low vaccine protection, in addition to in international locations with comparatively excessive vaccination protection, suggesting that it was a generalist. Information indicating that Delta was immunity-inhibited are much less direct and are available each from epidemiological research [44] and from neutralization assays [45]. Though these knowledge solely quantify 1 of the three elements of health (see under part on the connection between pathogen health and an infection traits), the BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech, mRNA-1273 Moderna, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines however nonetheless offered safety in opposition to an infection [46,47]. The case for the Alpha variant being immunity-adapted is even much less direct as a result of Alpha unfold and was then largely changed by Delta earlier than vital vaccine protection or pure immunity existed in most international locations. Thus, the epidemiological knowledge clearly present that Alpha was advantageous relative to the wild sort in naïve hosts [12,48,49], however estimates of its health in primed hosts once more come from proxies utilizing vaccine efficacy. The essential level for each variants is that they’d have turn out to be dominant no matter whether or not vaccines had been deployed as a result of they’re generalists.

Extra not too long ago, Omicron variants have unfold broadly, changing the Delta variant all over the place [50]. Omicron variants seem like immunity-adapted [51–53] and preliminary observations counsel that they’re immunity-inhibited [54,55]. At this stage, nevertheless, it’s not clear if Omicron variants are generalists or specialists. A part of the rationale for uncertainty is that vaccine protection and priming by means of pure an infection is now reaching excessive sufficient ranges in lots of international locations that it has turn out to be tougher to evaluate the health of variants in naïve hosts. On the time of writing (July 2022), new Omicron sub-lineages proceed to come up and unfold, suggesting that additional viral adaptation is probably going. As talked about above, vaccine-driven evolution has tended to happen in different pathogens when both the advantages of prophylaxis are small (e.g., the vaccine doesn’t sufficiently suppress pathogen replication under transmissible ranges) or once they goal a small variety of pathogen epitopes [17,56]. Information more and more counsel that a minimum of the primary of those is true for SARS-CoV-2 and presently deployed vaccines [57–60]. As SARS-CoV-2 adapts additional to people, we’d due to this fact count on that specialist variants will start to look which have even larger reproductive success in primed populations however the place this elevated adaptation to the primed hosts comes at a value of diminished reproductive success in naïve populations.

So far as we all know, immunity-facilitated variants of SARS-CoV-2 haven’t but been reported and, relying on the obtainable genetic variation (Field 2), it’s doable that they by no means will come up. For a variant to be immunity-facilitated, immunity must both enhance the speed at which the variant generates new infections and/or lower the speed at which current infections brought on by the variant are misplaced from circulation by means of restoration, isolation, or demise. In principle, molecular processes involving antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of cell infectivity might present a mechanism by which immunity facilitation happens [6,7,45], however we all know of no proof that ADE has elevated transmission in any infectious illness. Immunity might additionally probably enhance the speed at which a variant generates new infections if primed folks have interaction in additional dangerous conduct (e.g., vaccinated persons are allowed entry to concert events and bars [61]). The opposite sort of variants that would theoretically be facilitated by immunity are variants whose transmission is curtailed as a result of they trigger extra extreme illness (e.g., resulting in isolation). Vaccination, which is geared toward decreasing illness severity, might additionally probably facilitate the silent or semi-silent unfold of such variants (Field 2) in a fashion instantly analogous to the variants facilitated by the first-generation vaccines in opposition to Marek’s illness [30].

In the long run, if variants like these hypothesized above seem and unfold, thereby compromising the utility of present vaccines, it’s seemingly that boosters and new vaccines can be launched. No matter whether or not such variants seem, as SARS-CoV-2 spreads within the human inhabitants and presumably turns into an endemic virus, the variety of folks with an immunological historical past resulting from pure an infection will enhance considerably. Because of this, the framework introduced right here will should be prolonged to account for a number of host sorts. Making longer-term predictions for such instances is troublesome at this stage as a result of an awesome deal will depend upon the character of the genetic variation that’s doable (Field 2).

The connection between pathogen health and an infection traits

The above evaluation focuses solely on pathogen health. One factor lacking from this dialogue is a consideration of how vaccination and pure immunity may drive the evolution of an infection traits similar to vaccine efficacy or illness severity. To raised illustrate the connection between the health of a variant (as measured by the expansion fee of infections that it causes) and the traits of the an infection, we will decompose absolutely the progress fee (ri) of a variant into 3 major elements of health (Fig 1 and Field 1): infectivity (the likelihood that, upon publicity, a variant infects both sort of host), transmissibility (the speed at which a variant produces infectious propagules from both host sort that contact uninfected people), and the infectious interval (the time interval throughout an an infection in every host sort when a variant produces infectious propagules). All else being equal, variants with elevated infectivity, elevated transmissibility, or an extended and early infectious interval (i.e., long-lasting infections and a brief era interval) can have an elevated progress fee.

Vaccine efficacy in opposition to an infection

The infectivity of a variant is a key property for figuring out how effectively a vaccine works in opposition to a variant. If σN and σP denote the infectivity of a variant in naïve and (vaccine) primed hosts respectively, then vaccine efficacy (VE) is the proportional discount in infectivity that vaccination confers, given by VE = 1−σP/σN. This highlights 2 essential issues concerning the utility of VE for understanding the evolutionary epidemiology of immunity-adapted variants. First, as a result of VE is a measure of the relative infectivity of a variant in vaccinated versus non-vaccinated hosts, a variant can have a diminished VE on account of a rise in σP and/or a lower in σN. Second, VE includes only one of the three completely different elements of health and so it supplies solely partial info for figuring out the destiny of a variant or the results it can have if it sweeps to fixation. For instance, the Beta and Gamma variants of SARS-CoV-2 each seem to have a diminished VE [62] but, to this point, neither has turn out to be the dominant variant. Measures of VE that seize different elements of pathogen adaptation to vaccinated hosts do exist [63].

A associated concern arises in discussions of vaccination that focus on so-called “escape variants.” Though this time period just isn’t at all times outlined exactly, it’s usually utilized in reference to variants that differ in epitope and so are in a position to escape a selected immune response as measured in inhibition assays in vitro [3,62,64–66]. For instance, SARS-CoV-2 variants are typically characterised by each their transmissibility (as measured by their general progress fee and/or R0) and their efficiency in inhibition assays. We’ve purposefully prevented utilizing this sort of characterization right here as a result of this strategy conflates the mechanism by means of which a variant is probably tailored to primed hosts (i.e., escape from a selected immunity and so better potential to duplicate inside a person) with the supply of choice that favors the variant (e.g., elevated infectivity). It’s helpful to maintain these notions distinct as a result of there are a lot of completely different mechanisms by means of which a variant could be tailored to primed hosts (Field 1) and every of those can have an effect on any of the three major epidemiological elements of health (i.e., infectivity, transmissibility, and infectious interval; Fig 1). Due to this fact, we consider essentially the most constant, common, and agnostic approach to characterize variants is as described in Fig 3. Ideally, we’d additionally quantify a number of distinct an infection traits (infectivity, transmissibility, and infectious interval) for variants that come up, together with this quantification of health (S1 Appendix). Such an strategy is feasible for SARS-CoV-2 utilizing the unprecedented availability of genetically resolved, actual time epidemiological knowledge (Field 3).

Field 3. The way to characterize the health of SARS-CoV-2 variants?

The continuing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is characterised by an unprecedented entry to incidence and sequencing knowledge in actual time. This knowledge supplies a singular alternative for quantifying the underlying elements of pathogen health (infectivity, transmissibility, and an infection period) associated to adaptation to naïve and primed hosts. Three major dynamical variables carry helpful details about these elements of health (S1 Appendix).

First, the per capita progress fee of the epidemic supplies details about the potential emergence and the unfold of recent variants. Any deviation from the expected drop in incidence of the wild sort as a result of construct up of pure immunity and rising vaccination protection might sign the unfold of an immunity-adapted variant (ΔrP>0).

Second, evaluation of the change in frequency of a variant permits some inference to be made about which elements of health underly adaptation to pure immunity or vaccination. We present in S1 Appendix that the magnitude of change within the frequency of a variant will likely be proportional to the supply of prone hosts and the proportion of primed hosts if the variant obtains its benefit by means of elevated transmissibility (β) or infectivity (σ), however this modification will likely be impartial of prone hosts if the variant obtains its benefit by means of an extended an infection period. Due to this fact, as the supply to prone hosts varies with lockdowns and different non-pharmaceutical interventions, in addition to with the protection of vaccination, monitoring how this impacts the change in variant frequency can inform us concerning the mechanism underlying the variant’s success [67,68].

Third, the overrepresentation of a variant in primed hosts can be utilized as an early sign that the variant is immunity-adapted. We present in S1 Appendix that the distinction in variant frequency between naïve and primed hosts (i.e., the genetic differentiation of the pathogen populations within the 2 sorts of hosts) is principally ruled by the relative infectivity of the variant in primed hosts, however not by its transmissibility. Therefore, the evaluation of those 3 dynamic variables supplies a approach to start disentangling the three main elements of health.

Illness severity

Arguably, crucial an infection attribute from the standpoint of human well being is the severity of illness brought on by a variant. Most definitions of severity seize each the morbidity and the mortality brought on by an infection. As such, severity can have an effect on all 3 elements of health. For instance, excessive illness severity may cut back an infection period by means of elevated mortality, or it would cut back the transmissibility by means of a discount in exercise stage and thus the contact fee of contaminated people [69]. Usually, illness severity per se is disadvantageous to the pathogen and thus chosen in opposition to [70]. It’s however troublesome to make predictions about how illness severity will evolve as a result of variants that trigger extra extreme illness might need elevated health relative to the wild sort by means of variations in different elements of health [67]. For instance, knowledge means that the Alpha variant of SARS-CoV-2 could trigger extra extreme illness than the Wuhan wild sort [71,72], however it however has larger health as a result of its transmissibility is larger. As well as, illness severity could also be partially mediated by the host immune response, and a few in vitro research counsel that sure antibodies could “improve” the replication of the virus and induce extra signs [6,73]. A SARS-CoV-2 variant that would escape from neutralizing antibodies and exploit this enhancing impact might theoretically result in better illness severity in primed hosts [7]. This illustrates that, though we will make fairly strong and dependable predictions concerning the evolution of pathogen health in naïve and primed hosts, it’s tougher to make predictions concerning the underlying elements of health or illness severity since variants with very completely different values of the three health elements can however have the identical general health (Containers 1 and three). Because of this pattens of evolution in these an infection traits are more likely to be considerably idiosyncratic. It is a main motive why we can not extrapolate the evolutionary trajectories of such traits from one pathogen to a different.

Regardless of the dearth of strong theoretical predictions about illness severity, just a few observations from different infectious ailments might be related to SARS-CoV-2. First, vaccine safety tends to be much more evolutionarily strong in opposition to illness than in opposition to an infection. This conclusion arises from the statement that when pathogens have advanced in response to vaccines previously, vaccinated people which might be contaminated by a pathogen are inclined to have higher outcomes than non-vaccinated people [42]. A possible concern is that if there are enhancing results of antibodies on illness severity [74,75], as there might be for COVID [6,7,73]. Second, for pathogens with coexisting serotypes, vaccine-driven serotype alternative might in precept enhance or lower general illness burdens if completely different serotypes have completely different propensities for inflicting illness, as they usually do (for instance, [76]). Rational design of variant-based vaccines should due to this fact take into account each the present prevalence of every variant and their probability of inflicting illness following an infection. Third, underneath sure circumstances, vaccines could result in the evolution of extremely virulent variants. The perfect instance of that is MDV, through which extremely virulent variants of the virus kill their hosts so rapidly that they’re unable to persist within the absence of vaccination [30]. Vaccines ameliorate the illness severity of MDV and due to this fact enable hosts contaminated by these extremely virulent variants to stay alive, however they don’t forestall transmission. Nevertheless, regardless of this impact, vaccinated chickens uncovered to those extremely virulent variants are however higher off than non-vaccinated chickens uncovered to the unique wild sort. Against this, non-vaccinated chickens are actually at better threat of an infection with variants inflicting extra extreme Marek’s illness than they had been previous to the introduction of the vaccine. No matter whether or not SARS-CoV-2 follows this path, vaccination stays our only instrument to mitigate the epidemic, as was the case with MDV [31]. Vaccination additionally reduces the variety of instances, which can additionally decelerate the flux of recent mutations and thus the likelihood of pathogen adaptation (Field 2).

Implications for SARS-CoV-2

If additional adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 happens in response to immune priming, then our framework and the examination of earlier experimental and empirical examples counsel that the long-term consequence will seemingly yield specialist variants. The trail to getting there’ll seemingly contain immunity-inhibited variants, that means that we’re more likely to, a minimum of partially, retain the advantages of vaccination with first-generation SARS-CoV-2 vaccines within the quick time period. Within the meantime, there’s an pressing want to observe the epidemiology and evolution of the virus [56]. This can higher characterize newly arising variants (Field 3) and make it doable to determine if, like for influenza, new vaccines are wanted to counteract viral adaptation.

Additionally it is vital to emphasize that considerations about doable future viral evolution usually are not a motive to withhold presently obtainable vaccines. First, vaccines are presently enormously decreasing illness burdens and saving lives [77]. Second, as mentioned above, a lot of the evolution that has occurred in SARS-CoV-2 includes generalist variants that will have unfold even had current vaccines been withheld. Third, immunity arising from pure infections may even impression on-going viral evolution. It’s inconceivable to know a priori whether or not pure immunity or vaccine-induced immunity would be the stronger evolutionary driver. Fourth, even with the newer variants of SARS-CoV-2, present mRNA vaccines considerably cut back the likelihood of an infection and an infection period in comparison with infections in naïve people [54,55,59,60,62], which very considerably reduces evolutionary potential (Field 2).

Going ahead, it’s fairly doable that new vaccine schedules (e.g., larger doses, boosters, combos of current vaccines) or next-generation vaccines (e.g., new RNA sequences, mucosal vaccines) will likely be required to cope with SARS-CoV-2 evolution. A various vary of vaccine sorts are already getting used across the globe, and vaccine schedules in lots of areas are being regularly adjusted. If this range generates related immunological heterogeneity inside and amongst populations, then pure choice might favor completely different viral variants at completely different instances in numerous areas, and even perhaps outcome within the coexistence of a number of variants. In that case, vaccination applications could should be regularly adjusted at a nationwide or regional stage, as is important to regulate coronaviruses in agriculture [78,79]. The extra that vaccination suppresses transmission, targets a number of epitopes, and extra successfully inhibits an infection and within-host replication and so mutation and recombination, the higher will probably be at slowing the speed of adaptation (Field 2) and offering sustainable long-term efficacy [56].


Within the early section of pandemics, we count on the rise of variants which might be higher at spreading than their ancestors in each naïve and primed hosts (generalists). Afterward, pathogen evolution ought to contain specialised diversifications to primed hosts and so some lower of adaptation to naïve hosts. Each generalist and specialist variants could be inhibited by immunity, the place the expansion fee of infections decreases because the fraction of primed hosts will increase. Underneath these circumstances, even when the impression of vaccination is eroded by pathogen evolution, the general unfold of an infection remains to be diminished by vaccination. Immunity-facilitated variants also can come up. On this case, the general unfold of an infection might theoretically go up because the fraction of primed hosts will increase (similar to by means of vaccination) however this doesn’t indicate that the general stage of illness essentially will enhance in both a person an infection or within the inhabitants general.

Though our framework predicts the course and energy of choice, it doesn’t exactly predict the evolutionary trajectory that will likely be adopted as a result of there isn’t a means of figuring out upfront what phenotypes can be found to the pathogen genetically (through mutation or recombination). There may be additionally no means of figuring out upfront how explicit mutations relate to the a number of dimensions of the health panorama, even when they could have a bonus on a specific dimension in a laboratory assay.

Up to now, the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern which have turn out to be dominant have been immunity-inhibited. Many of those variants are additionally generalists that will have unfold no matter vaccination. In some unspecified time in the future, we count on additional adaptation to outcome from the unfold of specialist variants, though whether or not these variants will likely be immunity-inhibited or immunity-facilitated will depend upon mutational availability. Past these expectations, a priori prediction about future vaccine efficacy and illness severity for SARS-CoV-2 just isn’t doable. Molecular epidemiological surveillance will likely be vital for detecting and characterizing viral adaptation because it unfolds.

Supporting info

S1 Fig. Typology of pathogen variants.

We are able to establish 8 several types of variants. The panel (a) is increasing the outline of Fig 2 and the panel (b) is indicating the situation of those 8 sorts. Variant sort I is customized to naïve hosts however maladapted on primed hosts. Variant sort V is maladapted on each sorts of hosts. We concentrate on the 6 immunity-adapted variants with 〖∆r〗_P>0. Variants II, III, and IV are generalist variants (i.e., 〖∆r〗_N>0) and the magnitude of 〖∆r〗_P explains the distinction between these 3 variants. Variants VI, VII, and VIII are specialist variants (i.e., 〖∆r〗_N<0) and the magnitude explains the distinction between these 3 variants. Word that variants IV, VII, and VIII have a progress fee that will increase with the fraction of hosts primed. This elevated progress fee can have main public well being implications. Specifically, with variants IV and VIII, evolution is anticipated to yield the next pathogen progress fee after 100% primed (the advanced progress fee r_P is indicated with the black dot) than after 0% primed (the advanced progress fee r_N indicated with the white dot).



We thank the Newton Institute, the RAMP continuity community, and the JUNIPER consortium for organizing a workshop on Evolutionary Implications of the COVID-19 Vaccination Programme in spring 2021, which sparked the current work.


  1. 1.
    Gandon S, Mackinnon M, Nee S, Learn A. Imperfect vaccination: some epidemiological and evolutionary penalties. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2003;270(1520):1129–1136. pmid:12816650
  2. 2.
    Levins R. Principle of health in a heterogeneous atmosphere. I. The health set and adaptive perform. Am Nat. 1962;96(891):361–373.
  3. 3.
    Saito A, Irie T, Suzuki R, Maemura T, Nasser H, Uriu Ok, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike P681R mutation, an indicator of the Delta variant, enhances viral fusogenicity and pathogenicity. bioRxiv. 2021.
  4. 4.
    Thorne LG, Bouhaddou M, Reuschl AK, Zuliani-Alvarez L, Polacco B, Pelin A, et al. Evolution of enhanced innate immune evasion by the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 UK variant. bioRxiv. 2021. pmid:34127972
  5. 5.
    Rénia L, Goh YS. Malaria parasites: the good escape. Entrance Immunol. 2016;7:463. pmid:27872623
  6. 6.
    Liu Y, Soh WT, Ji Ok, Hirose M, Nakayama EE, Li S, et al. An infectivity-enhancing website on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein focused by antibodies. Cell. 2021. pmid:34139176
  7. 7.
    Liu Y, Arase N, Ji Ok, Hirose M, Li S, Tada A, et al. The SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is poised to accumulate full resistance to wild-type spike vaccines. bioRxiv. 2021.
  8. 8.
    Acevedo A, Brodsky L, Andino R. Mutational and health landscapes of an RNA virus revealed by means of inhabitants sequencing. Nature. 2014;505(7485):686–690. pmid:24284629
  9. 9.
    Sanjuán R, Nebot MR, Chirico N, Mansky LM, Belshaw R. Viral mutation charges. J Virol. 2010;84(19):9733–9748. pmid:20660197
  10. 10.
    Muñoz-Alá MÁ, Nace RA, Zhang L, Russell SJ. Serotypic evolution of measles virus is constrained by a number of co-dominant B cell epitopes on its floor glycoproteins. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2(4):100225. pmid:33948566
  11. 11.
    Saad-Roy CM, Morris SE, Metcalf CJE, Mina MJ, Baker RE, Farrar J, et al. Epidemiological and evolutionary issues of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dosing regimes. Science. 2021;372(6540):363–370. pmid:33688062
  12. 12.
    Davies NG, Abbott S, Barnard RC, Jarvis CI, Kucharski AJ, Munday JD, et al. Estimated transmissibility and impression of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Science. 2021;372(6538). pmid:33658326
  13. 13.
    Mishra S, Mindermann S, Sharma M, Wittaker C, Mellan TA, et al. Report 44: Latest traits in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in England. Imperial Faculty London (2021-05-20). doi:
  14. 14.
    Gandon S, Day T. The evolutionary epidemiology of vaccination. J R Soc Interface. 2007;4(16):803–817. pmid:17264055
  15. 15.
    Gandon S, Lion S. Focused vaccination and the pace of SARS-CoV-2 adaptation. medRxiv. 2021.
  16. 16.
    McLeod DV, Gandon S. Multilocus adaptation to vaccination. bioRxiv. 2021.
  17. 17.
    Kennedy DA, Learn AF. Why does drug resistance readily evolve however vaccine resistance doesn’t? Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 1851;2017(284):20162562.
  18. 18.
    Barclay VC, Sim D, Chan BHK, Nell LA, Rabaa MA, Bell AS, et al. The evolutionary penalties of blood-stage vaccination on the rodent malaria Plasmodium chabaudi. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(7):e1001368.
  19. 19.
    Carman WF, Karayiannis P, Waters J, Thomas HC, Zanetti AR, Manzillo G, et al. Vaccine-induced escape mutant of hepatitis B virus. Lancet. 1990;336(8711):325–329. pmid:1697396
  20. 20.
    Klushkina VV, Kyuregyan KK, Kozhanova TV, Popova OE, Dubrovina PG, Isaeva OV, et al. Affect of Common Hepatitis B Vaccination on Prevalence, An infection-Related Morbidity and Mortality, and Circulation of Immune Escape Variants in Russia. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0157161. pmid:27280884
  21. 21.
    Yimnoi P, Posuwan N, Wanlapakorn N, Tangkijvanich P, Theamboonlers A, Vongpunsawad S, et al. A molecular epidemiological examine of the hepatitis B virus in Thailand after 22 years of common immunization. J Med Virol. 2016;88(4):664–673. pmid:26331587
  22. 22.
    Pawloski LC, Queenan AM, Cassiday PK, Lynch AS, Harrison MJ, Shang W, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis in america. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21(2):119–125.
  23. 23.
    Safarchi A, Octavia S, Luu LDW, Tay CY, Sintchenko V, Wooden N, et al. Pertactin detrimental Bordetella pertussis demonstrates larger health underneath vaccine choice stress in a blended an infection mannequin. Vaccine. 2015;33(46):6277–6281.
  24. 24.
    Safarchi A, Octavia S, Luu LDW, Tay CY, Sintchenko V, Wooden N, et al. Higher colonisation of newly emerged Bordetella pertussis within the co-infection mouse mannequin examine. Vaccine. 2016;34(34):3967–3971.
  25. 25.
    Catelli E, Lupini C, Cecchinato M, Ricchizzi E, Brown P, Naylor CJ. Area avian metapneumovirus evolution avoiding vaccine induced immunity. Vaccine. 2010;28(4):916–921. pmid:19931381
  26. 26.
    Welch TJ, Verner-Jeffreys DW, Dalsgaard I, Wiklund T, Evenhuis JP, Cabrera JAG, et al. Unbiased emergence of Yersinia ruckeri biotype 2 in america and Europe. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(10):3493–3499.
  27. 27.
    Tinsley JW, Lyndon AR, Austin B. Antigenic and cross-protection research of biotype 1 and biotype 2 isolates of Yersinia ruckeri in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J Appl Microbiol. 2011;111(1):8–16.
  28. 28.
    Osterrieder N, Kamil JP, Schumacher D, Tischer BK, Trapp S. Marek’s illness virus: from miasma to mannequin. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(4):283–294. pmid:16541136
  29. 29.
    Witter RL. Elevated virulence of Marek’s illness virus subject isolates. Avian Dis. 1997;41(1):149–163. pmid:9087332
  30. 30.
    Learn AF, Baigent SJ, Powers C, Kgosana LB, Blackwell L, Smith LP, et al. Imperfect vaccination can improve the transmission of extremely virulent pathogens. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(7):e1002198. pmid:26214839
  31. 31.
    Kennedy DA, Dunn JR, Dunn PA, Learn AF. An observational examine of the temporal and spatial patterns of Marek’s-disease-associated leukosis condemnation of younger chickens in america of America. Prev Vet Med. 2015;120(3):328–335. pmid:25998661
  32. 32.
    Croucher NJ, Finkelstein JA, Pelton SI, Mitchell PK, Lee GM, Parkhill J, et al. Inhabitants genomics of post-vaccine modifications in pneumococcal epidemiology. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):656–663. pmid:23644493
  33. 33.
    Huang SS, Hinrichsen VL, Stevenson AE, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman Ok, Pelton SI, et al. Continued impression of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on carriage in younger youngsters. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):e1–e11. pmid:19564254
  34. 34.
    Yildirim I, Stevenson A, Hsu KK, Pelton SI. Evolving image of invasive pneumococcal illness in Massachusetts youngsters: a comparability of illness in 2007–2009 with earlier intervals. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31(10):1016–1021. pmid:22673142
  35. 35.
    Covert C, Ding L, Brown D, Franco EL, Bernstein DI, Kahn JA. Proof for cross-protection however not type-replacement over the 11 years after human papillomavirus vaccine introduction. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019.
  36. 36.
    Hallander HO, Advani A, Donnelly D, Gustafsson L, Carlsson RM. Shifts of Bordetella pertussis variants in Sweden from 1970 to 2003, throughout three intervals marked by completely different vaccination applications. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2856–2865.
  37. 37.
    Adam HJ, Richardson SE, Jamieson FB, Rawte P, Low DE, Fisman DN. Altering epidemiology of invasive Haemophilus influenzae in Ontario, Canada: proof for herd results and pressure alternative resulting from Hib vaccination. Vaccine. 2010;28(24):4073–4078.
  38. 38.
    Pérez-Trallero E, Vicente D, Montes M, Cisterna R. Constructive impact of meningococcal C vaccination on serogroup alternative in Neisseria meningitidis. Lancet. 2002;360(9337):953.
  39. 39.
    Luchs A, Cilli A, Morillo SG, de Souza GD, de Souza KAF, Vieira HR, et al. Detection of the rising rotavirus G12P[8] genotype at excessive frequency in Brazil in 2014: Successive alternative of predominant strains after vaccine introduction. Acta Trop. 2016;156:87–94. pmid:26748357
  40. 40.
    Bedford T, Riley S, Barr IG, Broor S, Chadha M, Cox NJ, et al. World circulation patterns of seasonal influenza viruses fluctuate with antigenic drift. Nature. 2015;523(7559):217–220. pmid:26053121
  41. 41.
    Carrat F, Flahault A. Influenza vaccine: the problem of antigenic drift. Vaccine. 2007;25(39):6852–6862. pmid:17719149
  42. 42.
    Kennedy DA, Learn AF. Why the evolution of vaccine resistance is much less of a priority than the evolution of drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(51):12878–12886. pmid:30559199
  43. 43.
    Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention. Science transient: COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. Out there from:
  44. 44.
    Chung H, He S, Nasreen S, Sundaram M, Buchan S, Wilson S, et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in opposition to symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 an infection and extreme COVID-19 outcomes in Ontario, Canada. medRxiv. 2021.
  45. 45.
    Li D, Edwards RJ, Manne Ok, Martinez DR, Schäfer A, Alam SM, et al. In vitro and in vivo capabilities of SARS-CoV-2 infection-enhancing and neutralizing antibodies. Cell. 2021;184(16):4203–4219. pmid:34242577
  46. 46.
    Noori M, Nejadghaderi SA, Arshi S, Carson-Chahhoud Ok, Ansarin Ok, Kolahi AA, et al. Efficiency of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies in opposition to extreme acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2 variants of concern: A scientific evaluation of in vitro research. Rev Med Virol. 2021;e2277. pmid:34286893
  47. 47.
    Liu C, Ginn HM, Dejnirattisai W, Supasa P, Wang B, Tuekprakhon A, et al. Diminished neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 by vaccine and convalescent serum. Cell. 2021;184(16):4220–4236. pmid:34242578
  48. 48.
    Jewell BL. Monitoring variations between the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant and different lineages. Lancet Public Well being. 2021;6(5):e267–e268. pmid:33857454
  49. 49.
    Volz E, Mishra S, Chand M, Barrett JC, Johnson R, Geidelberg L, et al. Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Nature. 2021;593(7858):266–269. pmid:33767447
  50. 50.
    Elliott P, Bodinier B, Eales O, Wang H, Haw D, Elliott J, et al. Speedy enhance in Omicron infections in England throughout December 2021: REACT-1 examine. Science. 2022;375(6587):1406–1411. pmid:35133177
  51. 51.
    Greaney AJ, Starr TN, Gilchuk P, Zost SJ, Binshtein E, Loes AN, et al. Full mapping of mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding area that escape antibody recognition. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(1):44–57. pmid:33259788
  52. 52.
    McCallum M, Czudnochowski N, Rosen LE, Zepeda SK, Bowen JE, Partitions AC, et al. Structural foundation of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron immune evasion and receptor engagement. Science. 2022;375(6583):864–868. pmid:35076256
  53. 53.
    Paton RS, Overton CE, Ward T. The fast alternative of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant by Omicron (B.1.1.529) in England. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(652):eabo5395. Out there from: pmid:35503007
  54. 54.
    Andrews N, Stowe J, Kirsebom F, Toffa S, Rickeard T, Gallagher E, et al. Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness in opposition to the Omicron (B. 1.1. 529) variant. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(16):1532–1546. pmid:35249272
  55. 55.
    Kirsebom FC, Andrews N, Stowe J, Toffa S, Sachdeva R, Gallagher E, et al. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in opposition to the omicron (BA. 2) variant in England. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. pmid:35623379
  56. 56.
    Kennedy DA, Learn AF. Monitor for COVID-19 vaccine resistance evolution throughout medical trials. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(11):e3001000. pmid:33166303
  57. 57.
    Brown CM, Vostok J, Johnson H, Burns M, Gharpure R, Sami S, et al. Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infections, together with COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections, related to massive public gatherings–Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(31):1059.
  58. 58.
    Chia PY, Ong SWX, Chiew CJ, Ang LW, Chavatte JM, Mak TM, et al. Virological and serological kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant vaccine-breakthrough infections: a multi-center cohort examine. medRxiv. 2021.
  59. 59.
    Kissler SM, Fauver JR, Mack C, Tai CG, Breban MI, Watkins AE, et al. Viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated and unvaccinated people. medRxiv. 2021.
  60. 60.
    Riemersma KK, Grogan BE, Kita-Yarbro A, Halfmann P, Kocharian A, Florek KR, et al. Shedding of infectious SARS-CoV-2 regardless of vaccination when the Delta variant is prevalent-Wisconsin, July 2021. medRXiv. 2021:2021–07.
  61. 61.
    Buchan SA, Chung H, Brown KA, Austin PC, Fell DB, Gubbay J, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in opposition to Omicron or Delta an infection. medRxiv. 2022:2021–12.
  62. 62.
    Planas D, Veyer D, Baidaliuk A, Staropoli I, Guivel-Benhassine F, Rajah MM, et al. Diminished sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization. Nature. 2021;596(7871):276–280. pmid:34237773
  63. 63.
    Halloran ME, Haber M, Longini IM Jr, Struchiner CJ. Direct and oblique results in vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133(4):323–331. pmid:1899778
  64. 64.
    Hastie KM, Li H, Bedinger D, Schendel SL, Dennison SM, Li Ok, et al. Defining variant-resistant epitopes focused by SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: A world consortium examine. Science. 2021:eabh2315. pmid:34554826
  65. 65.
    Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, Schlub TE, Wheatley AK, Juno JA, et al. Neutralizing antibody ranges are extremely predictive of immune safety from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 an infection. Nat Med. 2021;1–7.
  66. 66.
    Kupferschmidt Ok. Evolving risk. Science. 2021;373(6557):844–849. pmid:34413220
  67. 67.
    Day T, Gandon S, Lion S, Otto SP. On the evolutionary epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2. Curr Biol. 2020;30(15):R849–R857. pmid:32750338
  68. 68.
    Otto SP, Day T, Arino J, Colijn C, Dushoff J, Li M, et al. The origins and potential way forward for SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern within the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Biol. 2021;31:R918–R929. pmid:34314723
  69. 69.
    Day T. Parasite transmission modes and the evolution of virulence. Evolution. 2001;55(12):2389–2400. pmid:11831655
  70. 70.
    Cressler CE, McLeod DV, Rozins C, Van Den Hoogen J, Day T. The adaptive evolution of virulence: a evaluation of theoretical predictions and empirical exams. Parasitology. 2016;143(7):915–930. pmid:26302775
  71. 71.
    Challen R, Brooks-Pollock E, Learn JM, Dyson L, Tsaneva-Atanasova Ok, Danon L. Threat of mortality in sufferers contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/1: matched cohort examine. BMJ. 2021;372:n579. pmid:33687922
  72. 72.
    Davies NG, Jarvis CI, Edmunds WJ, Jewell NP, Diaz-Ordaz Ok, Keogh RH. Elevated mortality in community-tested instances of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7. Nature. 2021;593(7858):270–274. pmid:33723411
  73. 73.
    Lee WS, Wheatley AK, Kent SJ, DeKosky BJ. Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(10):1185–1191. pmid:32908214
  74. 74.
    Halstead SB, Katzelnick LC, Russell PK, Markoff L, Aguiar M, Dans LR, et al. Ethics of {a partially} efficient dengue vaccine: Classes from the Philippines. Vaccine. 2020;38(35):5572–5576. pmid:32654899
  75. 75.
    Redoni M, Yacoub S, Rivino L, Giacobbe DR, Luzzati R, Di Bella S. Dengue: Standing of present and under-development vaccines. Rev Med Virol. 2020;30(4):e2101. pmid:32101634
  76. 76.
    Cogliano V, Baan R, Straif Ok, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F. Carcinogenicity of human papillomaviruses. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(4):204. pmid:15830458
  77. 77.
    Gupta S, Cantor J, Simon KI, Bento AI, Wing C, Whaley CM. Vaccinations in opposition to COVID-19 could have averted as much as 140,000 deaths in america: examine examines function of COVID-19 vaccines and deaths averted in america. Well being Aff. 2021;40(9):1465–1472.
  78. 78.
    de Wit JJ, Prepare dinner JKA, van der Heijden HMJF. Infectious bronchitis virus variants: a evaluation of the historical past, present state of affairs and management measures. Avian Pathology. 2011;40(3):223–235.
  79. 79.
    Jordan B. Vaccination in opposition to infectious bronchitis virus: a steady problem. Vet Microbiol. 2017;206:137–143. pmid:28081857


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments